Participant Co-Design for Clinical Trials
(CONFIRM Trial)
What You Need to Know Before You Apply
What is the purpose of this trial?
This trial aims to enhance research participation by involving participants in designing the study methods, a process known as participant co-design. Researchers seek to determine if co-creating research procedures with participants increases their willingness to remain involved. The trial focuses on Black women, particularly those who speak English and weigh at least 110 pounds, to assess if this approach improves participation. Participants will either follow pre-designed procedures or help create new, more relevant ones. The goal is to determine if co-designing leads to higher engagement and completion rates. As an unphased trial, this study offers participants a unique opportunity to directly influence research methods and potentially enhance their engagement experience.
Do I have to stop taking my current medications for this trial?
The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It seems the focus is on co-designing research methods with participants, so medication changes are not mentioned.
What prior data suggests that this participant co-design method is safe?
Research has shown that involving participants in designing clinical trials is generally safe and well-received. Co-design, where participants help plan the study, makes it more relevant to them. Studies have found that this approach can make trials more attractive and reduce dropout rates. No specific reports indicate negative effects from co-design. Involving participants as co-researchers can lead to better results and satisfaction. Overall, evidence suggests that co-designing studies is a safe and effective method in clinical research.12345
Why are researchers excited about this trial?
Researchers are excited about this trial because it explores how involving participants in designing clinical trial procedures could improve outcomes and participant satisfaction. Unlike traditional trials where procedures are pre-set by researchers, this approach allows participants to have a say in how the trial is conducted, potentially making it more relevant and tailored to their needs. This method could lead to more engaged participants, better adherence to trial protocols, and ultimately more meaningful results.
What evidence suggests that this trial's methods could be effective for increasing research participation?
This trial will compare participant co-designed procedures with pre-designed procedures. Studies have shown that when participants help design research methods, known as co-design, the research becomes more relevant, valuable, and efficient. Specifically, eleven studies found better results when participants helped shape the research approach. Evidence suggests that co-design creates methods that are more engaging and acceptable, increasing participation and completion rates. Participants feel more involved and empowered, often leading to higher satisfaction and better data quality. Overall, co-design improves research effectiveness by aligning it more closely with participants' needs and preferences.26789
Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?
This trial is for English-speaking women who identify as Black or African American and weigh at least 110 pounds.Inclusion Criteria
Timeline for a Trial Participant
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
Participant Engagement
Participants are recruited and engaged as co-researchers to co-design study procedures
Implementation
Participants complete research procedures, either pre-designed or co-designed with researchers
Follow-up
Participants are monitored for retention and data completeness across two data collection cycles
What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?
Interventions
- Participant co-design
Trial Overview
The study compares two ways of doing research: one group follows standard procedures, while the other helps design the study tasks with researchers. The goal is to see if co-designing increases participation and completion rates.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2
Treatment groups
Active Control
Find a Clinic Near You
Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?
Augusta University
Lead Sponsor
Citations
Exploring co-design: a systematic review of concepts ... - PMC
While 44% lacked a co-design definition, 56% highlighted its collaborative, inclusive nature. Over half (64%) used specific frameworks with a 4– ...
Continuity Is Essential: The Experiences of Co‐Design ... - PMC
The aim of this study was to further explore participants' experiences, perceptions and attitudes to the design process and co‐design outcomes ...
3.
clinicalleader.com
clinicalleader.com/doc/quality-by-design-better-data-using-participant-insights-0001Quality by Design: Better Data Using Participant Insights
Unearth the innovative ways electronic clinical outcome assessments (eCOA) are improving data accuracy, reducing errors, and ensuring robust oversight in ...
Strategies for engaging patients in co-design of an ...
Collaboration improves research relevance, value, and efficiency ... Eleven studies reported improved outcomes, eight of which utilized iterative codesign.
Unleashing Patient Power: Co-Design for Better Trials
Co-designing with patients should be the starting point for clinical trial design, but sometimes their voices get lost in the shuffle.
Co-Design with Patients for Improving Patient Safety - PMC
Our panel will explore the continuum of engagement and strategies to move from tokenism to partnership to cocreation in patient safety research.
Exploring co-design: a systematic review of concepts ...
This systematic review aims to examine the peer-reviewed literature reporting on the use of co-design as a process in public health, ...
8.
patientfocusedmedicine.org
patientfocusedmedicine.org/researchers-and-patients-benefit-from-co-designing-clinical-trials-a-new-guide-aims-to-make-it-easier-to-collaborate/Researchers and patients benefit from co-designing clinical ...
We speak to two patient representatives about how collaboration can make studies more appealing to patients and reduce drop-out rates.
How to co-design a prototype of a clinical practice tool
We applied the framework in a case study to support co-design of a prototype track-and-trigger chart for detecting and responding to possible fetal ...
Unbiased Results
We believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your Data
We only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials Only
All of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.