772 Participants NeededMy employer runs this trial

Intravascular Ultrasound for Peripheral Artery Disease

(CLARITY Trial)

Recruiting at 4 trial locations
CP
Overseen ByCLARITY Project Office
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial aims to determine whether using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) during artery procedures can better prevent major limb issues or artery re-narrowing compared to standard imaging techniques alone. It targets individuals with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), which may present as constant foot pain, non-healing wounds, or gangrene due to poor blood flow. Candidates must be scheduled for a procedure to open blocked leg arteries and have imaging confirming significant artery blockage. As an unphased trial, this study provides an opportunity to contribute to medical advancements that could enhance treatment options for CLTI.

Do I need to stop my current medications for this trial?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial team or your doctor.

What prior data suggests that this IVUS-guided strategy is safe for peripheral artery disease patients?

Research has shown that using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) during treatments for peripheral artery disease (PAD) is generally safe. Studies have found that IVUS can lower the risk of major amputations and improve treatment success. For example, one study found that patients with IVUS-guided treatments had fewer amputations within a year compared to those with angiography-guided treatments. Another study demonstrated that IVUS led to better outcomes, such as higher success rates, than angiography alone.

While researchers are specifically testing IVUS for PAD, it has already proven successful in heart procedures, indicating it is generally well-tolerated. The available data does not show any major side effects from its use. Therefore, IVUS appears to be a safe option for those considering participation in trials using this technology.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for treating peripheral artery disease because it offers a more precise way to guide revascularization procedures. Unlike the standard approach that relies solely on angiography, IVUS provides detailed images from inside the blood vessels, allowing for better assessment of plaque and vessel walls. This enhanced imaging could lead to more accurate treatment, potentially improving outcomes and reducing complications for patients.

What evidence suggests that IVUS-guided strategy is effective for preventing major adverse limb events in patients with peripheral artery disease?

This trial will compare an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided strategy with an angiography-guided strategy for treating peripheral artery disease (PAD). Studies have shown that IVUS can lead to better outcomes for patients with PAD. Specifically, procedures guided by IVUS help keep arteries open longer, with 83.8% of patients maintaining good blood flow after one year. IVUS is also linked to fewer major amputations compared to traditional imaging methods. It allows doctors to see inside blood vessels more clearly, enabling more precise treatment. Additionally, IVUS has been associated with higher success rates during procedures, with 76.5% achieving technical success compared to 61% with angiography alone. Overall, evidence supports IVUS as a promising tool for improving treatment results in PAD.12346

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults with severe poor blood flow to the legs or feet (chronic limb-threatening ischemia) due to blocked arteries, who have ongoing pain, wounds, or gangrene and are scheduled for a minimally invasive artery-opening procedure. Participants must have significant artery narrowing shown by imaging.

Inclusion Criteria

I have severe leg artery disease with ongoing pain, wounds, or gangrene for at least two weeks.
My artery blockage is in the upper two-thirds of my lower leg artery and is larger than 2.5mm.
My target lesion is more than 10 cm above my ankle, with good blood flow below it.
See 3 more

Exclusion Criteria

I am under 18 years old.
I have had or need surgery to restore blood flow in the limb with the target lesion.
I am bedridden or unable to walk without help.
See 8 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo percutaneous revascularization using either intravascular ultrasound or angiography-guided strategy

Immediate procedure

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for major adverse limb events (MALE) and binary restenosis, as well as changes in quality of life and walking impairment

Up to 5 years

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • IVUS-guided strategy

Trial Overview

The study compares two ways of guiding procedures to open blocked leg arteries: using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) versus standard X-ray angiography alone. The goal is to see which method better prevents serious limb problems or re-narrowing after treatment.

How Is the Trial Designed?

2

Treatment groups

Active Control

Group I: Intravascular Ultrasound - guided strategyActive Control1 Intervention
Group II: Angiography - guided strategyActive Control1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

Lead Sponsor

Trials
380
Recruited
345,000+

Citations

Intravascular Ultrasound in the Endovascular Treatment of ...

IVUS has emerged as a useful adjunctive tool to angiography in an increasing number of catheter-based procedures for peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Arterial and ...

IVUS has demonstrated the ability to improve outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention, and there is increasing evidence to support its benefits in ...

IVUS in Peripheral Endovascular Interventions: A ...

Observational and randomized data involving PCI have demonstrated that IVUS improves procedural and clinical outcomes, including reduction in ...

The mid-term effect of intravascular ultrasound on ...

IVUS-guided EVT for PAD may possibly be associated with a lower major amputation rate compared with angiography alone-guided EVT.

Intravascular ultrasound guidance for lower extremity ...

This review details the utility of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for the management of peripheral artery and venous disease.

Intravascular Ultrasound Outperforms Angiography for ...

At 12 months, primary patency (a measure of the success rate of angioplasty and the study's primary endpoint) was achieved in 83.8% of patients ...