84000 Participants NeededMy employer runs this trial

HIV Screening Strategies for HIV Infection

(S2P Trial)

Recruiting at 4 trial locations
ER
NL
Overseen ByNancy Liu
Age: < 65
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Westat
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial seeks to identify the most effective method for screening HIV among young people in emergency departments. It evaluates three approaches: targeted screening, universally offered opt-in (where patients choose to participate), and universally offered opt-out (where participation is automatic unless declined). The trial aims to enhance HIV prevention and connect those in need to treatments like PrEP or ART. Teens and young adults aged 14-24 who visit a participating emergency department for any reason may qualify for this study.

As an unphased trial, it provides participants the chance to contribute to significant research that could improve HIV prevention strategies for young people.

What prior data suggests that these HIV screening strategies are safe?

Research has shown that HIV screening tests are very safe and reliable, designed to accurately detect HIV. Studies indicate that these tests can correctly identify HIV in 99.76% to 100% of cases, making them nearly perfect at finding the virus when present.

These tests are a regular part of health care and are recommended for everyone aged 13 to 64 at least once. The testing process is simple and carries no major risks. A small bruise might occur if blood is drawn for the test, but otherwise, these screening procedures are easy to handle and have no significant side effects reported.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about this trial because it explores different strategies for HIV screening that could potentially improve early detection rates. Unlike traditional methods, which might rely heavily on targeted testing or patient-initiated opt-in approaches, this study evaluates universally offered strategies, both opt-in and opt-out, alongside targeted screening. By rotating these strategies over time, the trial aims to determine the most effective method for catching infections early, which can lead to better management and treatment outcomes. This innovative approach could reshape how HIV screenings are conducted, making them more accessible and efficient.

What evidence suggests that this trial's HIV screening strategies could be effective?

This trial will evaluate different HIV screening strategies to determine their effectiveness in early detection and reducing late diagnoses. Research has shown that HIV screening helps find infections early, reduces late diagnoses, and lowers deaths related to HIV. Studies have found that regular HIV testing in healthcare settings can be cost-effective, especially in areas where more than 0.1% of people have undiagnosed HIV. HIV tests are highly accurate, correctly identifying those with HIV 99.76% to 100% of the time and those without it 99% of the time. Additionally, more frequent testing can shorten the time to diagnose HIV by about 14 months. These strategies aim to make HIV testing more common and accessible, enabling people to get tested and start treatment if needed.678910

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adolescents who visit the emergency department and may be at risk for HIV. It aims to include young people seeking care, regardless of why they are there, to improve HIV screening and prevention.

Inclusion Criteria

Present to the participating ED, regardless of chief complaint during the study period
I am between 14 and 24 years old.

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

24 months
Continuous screening in EDs

Intervention

Implementation of three different HIV screening strategies: targeted, universally offered opt-in, and universally offered opt-out, each for 8 months

24 months
Continuous engagement in EDs

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for HIV detection rates and cost-effectiveness of screening strategies

12 months

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • HIV screening strategies

Trial Overview

The study compares three ways of offering HIV tests in emergency departments: only to those at higher risk (targeted), offered to everyone with a choice (opt-in), or automatically unless declined (opt-out). Digital tools help connect participants to prevention or treatment if needed.

How Is the Trial Designed?

6

Treatment groups

Experimental Treatment

Group I: 6. Targeted > Universally offered opt-in > Universally offered opt-outExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: 5. Targeted > Universally offered opt-out > Universally offered opt-inExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group III: 4. Universally offered opt-out > Targeted > Universally offered opt-inExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group IV: 3. Universally offered opt-in > Targeted > Universally offered opt-outExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group V: 2. Universally offered opt-out > Universally offered opt-in > TargetedExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group VI: 1. Universally offered opt-in > Universally offered opt-out > TargetedExperimental Treatment1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Westat

Lead Sponsor

Trials
49
Recruited
39,700+

Citations

Cost-Effectiveness of Strategies to Improve HIV Testing and ...

We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of three strategies for implementing routine HIV screening. We used testing and counseling costs and receipt of test result ...

HIV Screening and Testing | High-Impact Prevention

Initial studies reported voluntary HIV screening to be cost-effective in health care settings in which HIV undiagnosed infection is ≥0.1%,23 ...

HIV Testing Strategies in Health Care Settings

HIV testing in health care settings has evolved from risk-based approaches towards more inclusive models that aim to normalise screening and reduce undiagn.

HIV Testing Strategies for Health Departments to End the ...

These activities were divided into 3 core strategies: expansion of routine screening in healthcare settings, locally tailored HIV testing initiatives in ...

Routine HIV Testing and Outcomes: A Population-Based ...

HIV testing was associated with highly favorable outcomes, including decreased late diagnosis, lower HIV-related mortality, and lower all-cause mortality,

HIV Testing and Screening - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

Early detection reduces the risk of HIV-related complications and lowers the likelihood within 24 hours and no later than 72 hours after ...

Clinical Testing Guidance for HIV | HIV Nexus

CDC recommends all patients between the ages of 13 and 64 be tested for HIV at least once as part of routine health care.

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection: Screening

Currently recommended antigen/antibody tests for HIV are highly accurate, with reported sensitivity ranging from 99.76% to 100% and specificity ...

HIV Diagnostic Testing - Screening and Diagnosis

HIV RNA levels have good clinical outcomes and do not sexually transmit HIV to others.[2. Implications for Interpreting Test Results and ...

HIV Testing: Types, How Often, What To Expect & Results

Current HIV tests are highly effective at detecting HIV. Current protocols for HIV testing reliably lead to an accurate diagnosis. What are the ...