Endoscopic Balloon Dilation for Esophageal Strictures
(BITES Trial)
What You Need to Know Before You Apply
What is the purpose of this trial?
This trial examines how varying balloon inflation times can aid in treating esophageal strictures in individuals born with esophageal atresia, a condition where the esophagus doesn't develop properly. The treatment uses an endoscopic balloon, a small balloon inserted through a tube, to widen the narrowed esophagus. Participants are divided into two groups: one with a 30-second balloon inflation and another with a 180-second inflation. This trial suits those who have undergone surgery to correct esophageal atresia and required balloon dilation for esophageal strictures in the past six months. As an unphased trial, it provides a unique opportunity to enhance understanding and treatment of esophageal strictures.
Do I need to stop my current medications for the trial?
The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.
What prior data suggests that endoscopic balloon dilation is safe for treating esophageal strictures?
Research has shown that endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) is generally a safe treatment for esophageal narrowing. One study demonstrated a 100% success rate with no unexpected problems. Another study found that using larger balloons is safe and effective, reducing hospital stays and costs.
For children, EBD is also considered safe, though the procedure's success can depend on the practitioner's experience. The risk of complications, such as an esophageal tear, is lower with EBD compared to other methods.
Overall, evidence suggests that EBD is well-tolerated and safe when performed correctly.12345Why are researchers excited about this trial?
Researchers are excited about endoscopic balloon dilation for esophageal strictures because it offers a non-surgical approach to widening narrowed sections of the esophagus. Unlike traditional methods like surgery or medication, this technique uses a balloon to gently stretch the esophagus, potentially reducing recovery time and discomfort. The trial is exploring two different durations for the dilation, 30 seconds and 180 seconds, to determine the most effective approach. This method could provide a quicker, less invasive option for patients, improving their quality of life with fewer complications.
What evidence suggests that endoscopic balloon dilation is effective for esophageal strictures?
Research has shown that endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) can effectively treat esophageal narrowings, with success rates ranging from 66% to 84%. One study demonstrated that weekly EBD led to long-term success for 55% of patients with complex narrowings. Another study found that using EBD as a preventive measure reduced the chance of developing a narrowing from 92% to 59%. However, these narrowings often recur after the first treatment, occurring in about 31.6% of patients. Although EBD generally works well technically, the narrowing might return after treatment. In this trial, participants will be randomized into two groups: Group A will undergo EBD for 30 seconds, and Group B will undergo EBD for 180 seconds, to evaluate the effectiveness of different dilation durations.12467
Who Is on the Research Team?
Jessica Yasuda, MD
Principal Investigator
Boston Children's Hospital
Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?
This trial is for children who have had surgery to fix esophageal atresia (a birth defect where the esophagus doesn't form properly) and now have a narrowing in their esophagus that needs balloon dilation. They must have needed at least one balloon dilation within the past 6 months.Inclusion Criteria
Timeline for a Trial Participant
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
Treatment
Participants undergo endoscopic balloon dilation for esophageal strictures, with Group A receiving 30 seconds of dilation and Group B receiving 180 seconds.
Follow-up
Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, including the number of dilations needed and changes in esophageal diameter.
What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?
Interventions
- Endoscopic Balloon Dilation
Trial Overview
The study compares different lengths of time that a balloon is kept inflated during endoscopic procedures to widen narrowed areas in the esophagus, aiming to see if inflation time affects treatment success.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2
Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Patients randomized into Group B will undergo endoscopic balloon dilation for a duration of 180 seconds.
Patients who are randomized into Group A will undergo endoscopic balloon dilation for a total of 30 seconds.
Find a Clinic Near You
Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?
Boston Children's Hospital
Lead Sponsor
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Collaborator
Citations
Predictors of outcomes of endoscopic balloon dilatation in ...
The response rates have been reported to be between 16% and 80%[11,12]. Recurrence was previously reported in 31.6% of patients after EBD treatment[5]. In our ...
Clinical outcomes of endoscopic balloon dilation for ...
also observed that 55 % of complex benign esophageal strictures who failed in endoscopic dilations at ≥2-week intervals achieved long-term success with weekly ...
3.
journals.lww.com
journals.lww.com/ajg/fulltext/2022/10002/s2259_the_efficacy_and_safety_of_treatment.2259.aspxS2259 The Efficacy and Safety of Treatment Outcomes for...
There was 100% technical success rate with no adverse events. The average diameter of the esophagus before and after triple therapy was 4.2 ± 1.63 mm and 13 ± ...
A comparison of three kinds of balloon dilatations for ...
More than half of the patients showed recurrence of stricture after first dilation. Despite Group L showed the best clinical effectiveness (P = ...
Efficacy of bougie versus balloon dilatation in children with ...
Endoscopic bougie and balloon dilatations were safe and effective, with no significant difference for short strictures.
The Efficacy and Safety of Treatment Outcomes for Refractory ...
Triple combination therapy may be useful in benign strictures that are refractory to standard techniques. Larger studies are needed to validate these findings.
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic ...
The re-stricture rate was significantly different between the BD and EIT groups (41.7% vs. 0%, respectively; P = 0.045). There were no significant differences ...
Unbiased Results
We believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your Data
We only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials Only
All of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.