124 Participants NeededMy employer runs this trial

Pipelle vs Curved Tip Aspirator for Endometrial Biopsy

OO
Overseen ByOlivia OB/GYN research manager
Age: 18+
Sex: Female
Trial Phase: Phase 4
Sponsor: Maimonides Medical Center
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial compares two tools for taking a tissue sample from the uterus to check for diseases like endometrial cancer. One group will undergo a biopsy using a Pipelle, while the other will use a Curved Tip Aspirator. The trial aims to determine which device better reaches the uterus and gathers enough tissue for a clear diagnosis. It suits individuals with unusual uterine bleeding or a risk of endometrial cancer. Participants should not be pregnant or have any pelvic infections. As a Phase 4 trial, the devices are already FDA-approved and proven effective, and the trial seeks to understand how they benefit more patients.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What is the safety track record for these endometrial sampling devices?

Research has shown that the Pipelle and Curved Tip Aspirator, used for endometrial biopsy, are safe. Studies highlight the Pipelle as a safe and well-tolerated procedure. Complications are very rare, with occasional reports of a small hole in the uterus, but these are uncommon.

The Curved Tip Aspirator, used in manual vacuum aspiration, is also considered safe. Studies have demonstrated its effectiveness and simplicity, with minimal complications. Risks, such as infection or bleeding, are similar to other biopsy methods but remain uncommon.

Both devices are widely used and have proven safe for collecting tissue samples from the uterus. Participants can expect a low risk of serious side effects with either device.12345

Why are researchers enthusiastic about this study treatment?

Unlike the standard of care for endometrial biopsy, which typically uses the Pipelle device, researchers are exploring the potential of a curved tip aspirator. The curved tip aspirator is designed to be more flexible and potentially less painful, which could improve patient comfort during the procedure. Additionally, this new device might provide more effective sampling of the endometrial lining, which could lead to more accurate diagnoses. Researchers are eager to see if these advantages translate into better outcomes for patients.

What evidence suggests that these endometrial sampling devices are effective for obtaining adequate samples?

This trial will compare the Pipelle and Curved Tip Aspirator for endometrial biopsy. Studies have shown that both tools effectively collect tissue samples for diagnosing conditions like endometrial cancer. Research indicates that the Pipelle device is highly accurate, with a sensitivity of up to 100% for detecting endometrial cancer and an overall accuracy of 98.9%. Comparisons with other biopsy tools suggest that the Curved Tip Aspirator collects samples as effectively as other methods. The Pipelle is also noted for being less painful and quicker than some other biopsy methods. Both devices are commonly used in medical practice and provide reliable tissue samples.13678

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for women aged 18–95 who need an endometrial biopsy. This includes younger women with risk factors for endometrial cancer, women over 45 with abnormal uterine bleeding, and postmenopausal women with bleeding or suspected uterine problems.

Inclusion Criteria

I am between 18 and 45 and have risk factors for endometrial cancer.
I am between 45 and 95 years old and have abnormal uterine bleeding.
I am postmenopausal and have bleeding or possible uterine problems.

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

1-2 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo endometrial sampling using either the Pipelle or Miltex device

1 day
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for any procedural complications such as uterine perforation, infection, bleeding, or cramping

1-2 weeks

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Curved Tip Aspirator
  • Pipelle

Trial Overview

The study compares two devices used to collect tissue from the uterus: the Pipelle and a curved tip aspirator (Miltex). Participants are randomly assigned to one of these standard methods to see which device works better at getting good samples.

How Is the Trial Designed?

2

Treatment groups

Experimental Treatment

Active Control

Group I: Curved tip aspiratorExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: PipelleActive Control1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Maimonides Medical Center

Lead Sponsor

Trials
72
Recruited
15,400+

Jefferson Drapkin

Lead Sponsor

Citations

NCT07513493 | Pipelle vs the Curved Aspirator Device

This arm will receive an endometrial biopsy using the curved tip aspirator. Intervention/Treatment, Device : Curved Tip Aspirator. Curved Tip ...

Hysteroscopic and aspiration biopsies in the histologic ... - PMC

This study aimed to compare the quality of histological endometrial samples collected through Pipelle aspiration and hysteroscopic biopsies

Pipelle vs Curved Tip Aspirator for Endometrial Biopsy

The primary aim of this study is to rigorously compare the efficacy of two commonly used endometrial sampling devices, the Pipelle and the ...

A prospective, randomized comparison of the Pipelle ...

This clinical trial suggests that Pipelle biopsy appears to be as effective as the. Novak curette in obtaining an adequate specimen for histologic analysis and ...

The Vabra aspirator versus the Pipelle device for outpatient ...

This study proved that the Vabra aspirator was not as effective as the Pipelle device in obtaining endometrial tissue for histological diagnosis.

6.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41272595/

A safety and feasibility study of manual vacuum aspiration ...

Conclusions: MVA is a safe, simple, and cost-effective technique for removing small-to-moderate endometrial polyp-like lesions. Except for ...

A safety and feasibility study of manual vacuum aspiration for ...

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) for the removal of endometrial polyp-like lesions, ...

Hysteroscopy vs. Vabra in Endometrial Cancer Diagnosis

Based on this study's findings, the authors reported a long-term complication risk of 0.001% (1/1028) over a follow-up period of 1 year, once again ...