Next Generation Sequencing for Wound Infection

(NGS Trial)

Not yet recruiting at 17 trial locations
CR
RP
Overseen ByResearch Project Director
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 3
Sponsor: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Must be taking: Antibiotics
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)This treatment is in the last trial phase before FDA approval
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial explores whether a new test called Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) can better identify infections in patients who have undergone surgery to repair a broken bone. Infections after such surgeries can cause more pain, extend recovery time, and sometimes necessitate additional surgeries. The trial compares the effectiveness of treatment guided by both NGS and standard tests against treatment guided only by standard tests. Patients who have had surgery to fix a fracture with metal plates or screws and are now experiencing a deep infection might be suitable candidates. The goal is to improve treatment success rates and help patients recover faster with fewer complications. As a Phase 3 trial, this study represents the final step before FDA approval, offering patients a chance to contribute to a potentially groundbreaking treatment.

Do I need to stop my current medications to join the trial?

The trial protocol does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. However, since the study involves antibiotic therapy prescribed by an Infectious Disease provider, it's possible that adjustments to your medications might be needed. Please consult with the study team for specific guidance.

What prior data suggests that Next Generation Sequencing is safe for diagnosing wound infections?

Past studies have shown that Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) is a helpful tool for identifying bacteria in wound infections. Research indicates that NGS excels at detecting bacteria that are difficult to culture in a lab, which standard tests might overlook. This capability allows doctors to select the most effective antibiotic treatment more accurately.

In terms of safety, NGS analyzes samples to identify bacteria without introducing new drugs or treatments to the body, making it generally well-tolerated. No reports link negative effects directly to using NGS for diagnosing infections. Notably, NGS is already utilized in other medical fields and is covered by Medicare, suggesting it is considered safe and effective in medical practice.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) for diagnosing wound infections because it offers a cutting-edge way to identify bacteria and other pathogens that cause infections. Unlike standard culture methods, which can miss certain microbes or take days to yield results, NGS rapidly provides comprehensive data about the entire microbial community in a wound. This means doctors can tailor antibiotic treatments more precisely and quickly, potentially leading to better patient outcomes and reduced antibiotic resistance.

What evidence suggests that Next Generation Sequencing is effective for identifying wound infections?

Research has shown that Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), which participants in this trial may receive, can detect more types of bacteria in wound infections than standard culture tests. NGS can identify rare and difficult-to-grow bacteria, enabling doctors to select the right antibiotics more quickly. For instance, one study found that NGS detected bacteria in 51% of wound samples, offering a clearer picture of the infection. This method has shown promise for chronic wounds and burns, suggesting it could improve treatment success by reducing the need for additional surgeries. By providing a more complete view of the bacteria causing the infection, NGS can lead to quicker recovery and fewer complications. Participants in the control arm will receive standard care without the use of NGS data.12367

Who Is on the Research Team?

RM

Roman M Natoli, MD

Principal Investigator

Indiana University, Methodist Hospital

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults aged 18 to 84 who have a deep infection after surgery to fix a broken bone with plates, screws, or rods. Participants must meet specific medical criteria for infection and be planning to receive antibiotics as part of their treatment.

Inclusion Criteria

I have had a fracture in my arm or leg near the wrist or ankle treated with internal fixation.
FRI confirmatory criteria CDC criteria (without the timeframe). This includes the possibility of culture negative infection but determined to be infection by treatment team.
My treatment plan includes antibiotics prescribed by an infection specialist.
See 1 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive treatment guided by either NGS and standard cultures or standard cultures alone to manage surgical site infections after fracture fixation.

12 months
Regular visits as per treatment protocol

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, with follow-up visits at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

12 months
5 visits (in-person)

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Next Generation Sequencing

Trial Overview

The study compares two ways of diagnosing infections after fracture surgery: one group gets both standard lab cultures and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) tests, while the other group gets only standard cultures. The goal is to see if adding NGS helps doctors choose better treatments and reduces failed recoveries.

How Is the Trial Designed?

2

Treatment groups

Experimental Treatment

Active Control

Group I: Diagnostic Test: NGS diagnostic findingsExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: Standard of Care (Control)Active Control1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Lead Sponsor

Trials
441
Recruited
2,157,000+

Citations

Next-Generation Sequencing: A Review of Technologies and ...

Next-generation sequencing provides a window into wound-associated microbial communities (microbiomes) with a reasonable cost and timeframe.

Next-Generation Sequencing for Pathogen Identification ...

We investigated the potential use of NGS for accurate identification and quantification of microbes in infected diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). We ...

The clinical value of metagenomic next-generation ... - PMC

We suggest that mNGS is a potential tool for pathogen detection in chronic wounds with granulation tissue, especially for mycobacterial identification.

Next Generation Sequencing for Wound Infection (NGS Trial)

The study focuses on the serious problem of infections and wound-healing issues that can happen after high-energy bone fractures.

A Comparative Application of Next-Generation Sequencing ...

In conclusion, this study supports the use of NGS as a rapid, accurate and cost effective alternative to TWC with burn wounds. © Copyright - Surgical Infection ...

Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for the ...

The value of next-generation sequencing (NGS) using Nanopore technology has been demonstrated in the case of diabetic patients' wounds or in prosthetic joint ...

7.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39093461/

Using Next-Generation Sequencing to Understand ...

This study uses advanced DNA sequencing to detect bacterial DNA on surgical blades used in upper extremity fracture surgeries.