132 Participants NeededMy employer runs this trial

Stem Cell Transplant for Blood Cancer

CG
Overseen ByChristopher Graham, MD
Age: Any Age
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 2
Sponsor: Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial tests a new method for treating blood cancer using stem cell transplants. Researchers aim to determine if a combination of medicines, such as Treosulfan and Fludarabine, along with a special treatment to prevent complications, can benefit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The trial seeks participants who have had these blood cancers and have a related or unrelated stem cell donor. Participants should have stable liver and kidney health and no serious heart issues. The trial aims to improve recovery and outcomes for those undergoing stem cell transplants. As a Phase 2 trial, this research focuses on measuring the treatment's effectiveness in an initial, smaller group, offering participants a chance to contribute to potentially groundbreaking advancements in blood cancer treatment.

Do I need to stop my current medications for the trial?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

A previous study found that patients treated with treosulfan and fludarabine experienced positive safety outcomes. Research has shown that this combination usually carries a low risk of serious side effects, allowing most patients to tolerate it well. Importantly, this combination aids in the successful attachment and growth of donor cells, which is crucial for effective stem cell transplants. Additionally, no major safety concerns emerged that required special safety plans, known as REMS (Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies), for treosulfan. This suggests that current research considers the treatment safe.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial's treatments?

Researchers are excited about the treatment combining Fludarabine and Treosulfan for blood cancers like AML and MDS because it integrates a novel approach using PTCy as a graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Unlike standard conditioning regimens that often use busulfan or cyclophosphamide, this treatment uses Treosulfan, which may be less toxic and better tolerated. Additionally, post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as part of the regimen may reduce the risk of GVHD more effectively than traditional methods. This combination could lead to improved outcomes and quality of life for patients undergoing stem cell transplants.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for blood cancer?

Research has shown that combining Treosulfan and Fludarabine is effective for patients with AML (acute myeloid leukemia) and MDS (myelodysplastic syndromes). In this trial, participants will receive the Treosulfan and Fludarabine preparative regimen with TBI, followed by a related or unrelated donor stem cell infusion. Studies have found that this combination leads to better outcomes than the traditional Busulfan-Fludarabine treatment. Specifically, one study reported that about 59.5% of patients experienced no major issues for 36 months. Additionally, this treatment is generally safer, causing fewer serious side effects while still allowing for successful donor cell integration. This makes it a promising option for patients undergoing stem cell transplants.678910

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for people aged 2 to 75 with certain blood cancers (like myelodysplastic syndrome or acute leukemia) who are healthy enough overall, have good heart, lung, liver, and kidney function, and have a suitable stem cell donor match.

Inclusion Criteria

I am 7 to 75 years old and can care for myself or play most of the time.
I have a suitable donor and my liver and kidney function are normal.
I am between 2 and 75 years old.
See 2 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Preparative Regimen

Participants receive Treosulfan and Fludarabine preparative regimen followed by stem cell infusion

2-3 weeks

Post-Transplant

Participants receive post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), tacrolimus, and MMF for GVHD prophylaxis

100 days

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for overall survival and transplant-related mortality

1-2 years

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Cyclophosphamide
  • Fludarabine
  • Treosulfan

Trial Overview

The study tests a gentler chemotherapy regimen using Treosulfan and Fludarabine before receiving donor stem cells. After transplant, patients get cyclophosphamide (PTCy), tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil to help prevent rejection or graft-versus-host disease.

How Is the Trial Designed?

1

Treatment groups

Experimental Treatment

Group I: Treo/Flu with PTCyExperimental Treatment7 Interventions

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota

Lead Sponsor

Trials
285
Recruited
15,700+

Citations

Outcomes with a combination of treosulfan and fludarabine ...

Conclusion: The Treosulfan and Fludarabine conditioning regimen demonstrates favorable efficacy in AML/MDS patients undergoing allo-HSCT ...

Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine ... - PMC

The Treo/Flu/AraC regimen has potentially very strong anti-leukemic, immunosuppressive and cytotoxic effects. This retrospective study evaluates the outcomes of ...

Outcomes Improved for Patients With AML and MDS ...

Outcomes Improved for Patients With AML and MDS Receiving Treosulfan/Fludarabine vs Busulfan/Fludarabine Conditioning Prior to HSCT. Susan ...

American Journal of Hematology | Blood Research Journal

EFS of patients (median age 60 years) was superior after treosulfan compared to RIC busulfan: 36-months-EFS rate 59.5% (95% CI, 52.2–66.1) vs.

Treosulfan Shown Effective, Safe as Conditioning for Allo- ...

The pivotal trial that led to the approval of treosulfan was based on the enrollment of 476 patients who were adults aged 18 to 70 years who ...

Conditioning with Treosulfan and Fludarabine Followed by ...

Casper and colleagues reported results in 56 patients, 18–66 years of age, with various hematologic malignancies, who were conditioned with treosulfan (30, 36 ...

Real world outcome analysis of treosulfan-based ...

Various studies demonstrated that treosulfan in combination with fludarabine showed a favorable acute toxicity profile, allowing donor cell engraftment.

214759Orig1s000 - accessdata.fda.gov

The Agency informed the Applicant that based on the currently available data, there were no safety issues that require a REMS for treosulfan. 3 ...

The effect of threosulfan-based versus busulfan ...

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of busulfan-based versus treosulfan-based conditioning regimens in patients with AML and ALL across nine ...

Survival Advantage of Treosulfan Plus Fludarabine Before ...

Patients with HCT-CI ≤2 had significantly higher overall survival (A, 71.2% versus 45.1%, P = .019) and disease-free survival (B, 70.3% versus 40.8%, P = .006) ...