Automated vs Manual Impaction for Total Hip Replacement

This trial tests two methods for hip replacement surgery: an automated device called HAMMR (Automated Impaction) and the traditional manual mallet. The goal is to determine which method improves surgical outcomes and reduces the surgeon's physical effort. Candidates for the trial include individuals undergoing elective primary hip replacement with compatible implants. Surgeons will perform 50 surgeries each, using both methods to compare results. As an unphased trial, this study allows patients to contribute to advancements in surgical techniques and potentially benefit from innovative technology.

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

Research has shown that the HAMMR automated impactor used in hip surgeries can reduce the strain and fatigue experienced by surgeons. It operates more quickly than manual methods, easing the surgical process. No specific safety concerns have been reported with the HAMMR device itself. The primary goal is to make surgeries quicker and easier for surgeons. As this trial does not involve a new drug or treatment, patient safety is not the main focus. Instead, the study examines how the device impacts the surgical process and the surgeon's experience.¹²³⁴⁵

Researchers are excited about this trial because it compares two different methods of impaction during total hip replacement surgery: automated impaction using the HAMMR device and traditional manual malleting. The automated HAMMR device is unique because it aims to provide consistent and precise force, potentially reducing the risk of variability and surgeon fatigue. This could lead to more predictable outcomes and quicker surgeries. On the other hand, manual malleting, the current standard, relies on the surgeon's strength and skill, which can vary. By comparing these methods, researchers hope to find out if the automated approach can enhance surgical precision and improve patient recovery.

This trial will compare two methods for total hip replacement: Automated Impaction using the HAMMR device and Manual Malleting. Research has shown that using an automated tool, like the HAMMR device, in hip replacement surgery can make the process quicker and more consistent. Studies have found that it significantly reduces the time needed for femoral broaching and lessens the physical effort required from surgeons. As a result, surgeons experience less fatigue, potentially leading to better patient outcomes. In contrast, using a manual tool relies on the surgeon's strength and accuracy, which can vary. Overall, the automated method may offer a more efficient and less tiring option for hip replacement surgeries.¹²³⁴⁵